Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to a
Simon St.Laurent wrote > >Sure, I was thinking of adding these extensions (perhaps they should be > >called contractions) as an option to ElCel's xmlcanon . Would anybody > >find this useful? > > As long as it's a separate part and not built right into the parser, it > sounds good to me. That would only be possible if the suggested changes were handled by some kind of pre-processor. I don't think such a pre-processor would be viable; it would need to have all the features of an XML parser itself. However, I don't see updating the XML parser as being a problem, so long as the extensions are controlled by options which are disabled by default. Regards ~Rob
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format