Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part
John Cowan <jcowan@r...> wrote: | Rick Jelliffe scripsit: |> Why not just assign whole element sets to a namespace, in the external |> DSDL framework, and leave the syntax of DTDs exactly as it is? | | I don't understand this. How do you specify that the content model of | a foo:one element is a foo:two element followed by an html:p element? Why is this a requirement? The content model of a foo:one element could specify a foo:two element followed by a foo:three element. Identifying a foo:three element as the "same" as an html:p element - either in a specific occurrence or for all occurrences of foo:three elements in various content models - is a straightforward matter of annotation. Using an attribute for this has precedent, too. |> What are the requirements for DTDs in DSDL? | | The title of Part 9 is all we have to go on, and it talks about | namespace-aware and datatype-aware DTDs. Insanity.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format