|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML Schema considered harmful?
I wanted to make one more comment -- regarding the length of schemas -- The concepts which XML schemas represent do not need XML syntax, it is sometimes difficult to understand what we are trying to do when we use this syntax. I had always wished some conceptual way of representing schemas in non-XML syntax -- abstracting out the necessary features. I am very glad that RELAX NG recently came up with a non XML syntax also.. I have not checked it out, but I am confident it will be useful.. I am sure that XML syntax might be useful in several scenarios (though I do not know when, and I do not think i need them at this point of time). Also, Thomas, if you can show me how you use substitution groups, that would help.. we can take it offline.. thanks and regards - murali. On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Thomas B. Passin wrote: > I use XML Schema at work on a particular project because it has basically > been decreed higher up. The schemas are complex because they are long, but > don't use a lot of complex capabilties of XMl schema. I have tried to keep > them as simple as possible (because that's all I can manage to handle) and > the most advanced feature we use is element substitution groups. These > schemas import other schemas that use different target namespaces.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








