[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: RESTTuto

• To: 'Dan Mabbutt' <Seigfried@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: RESTTutorial)
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 12:27:45 -0500

Our customers really don't know much about XML.  It is a 
checkbox.  Again, if they do that, say yes and take their 
money.  If they say "NENA spec'd ANI/ALI using the XML 
format", it is money for value.

They learn that from reading the business magazines specific 
to their business type, not the Wall Street Journal or USA Today.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Mabbutt [mailto:Seigfried@m...]

Customers don't REALLY know everything about what's good
for them. (Hey! There is no kind way to say it!) That's why things have to
be hammered out in interminable meetings.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: RESTTutorial)
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• Prev by Date: RE: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: AN N: RESTTutorial)
• Next by Date: RE: W3C style bodies aren't working anymore - Discuss
• Previous by thread: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: R ESTTutorial)
• Next by thread: Re: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: RESTTutorial)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread