Re: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: REST
On 21 May 2002 at 17:30, Mike Champion wrote: > Would anyone seriously argue that XML > would be taken more seriously if RELAX NG and other challenges to > the orthodoxy just went away? Bits like RNG provide the insights and clarity needed to understand the complexity of the orthodoxy. > I suspect that the best way forward is > to define what it is that we all agree works, refactor the specs > to put all this at the core, experiment with various ways to built > on top of the core, but freely admit that we're exploring > multiple ideas about schemas, query languages, web services architectures, > etc. and the *real* standards for these aren't baked yet. Sounds interesting, but XML 1.0 is (imho) not among the TR's that need refactoring.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format