[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: PSVI formalization

• To: "Jonathan Robie" <jonathan.robie@d...>,"Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: PSVI formalization
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 14:18:00 -0700
• Thread-index: AcH3nMA2A+2BeAljQruxPaDxNtdRzAAAYj+A
• Thread-topic: PSVI formalization

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Robie 
> [mailto:jonathan.robie@d...] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:02 PM
> To: Dare Obasanjo; Simon St.Laurent; xml-dev@l...
> Subject: RE:  PSVI formalization
> 
> 
> At 10:44 AM 5/9/2002 -0700, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> >All this talk of PSVI leads me to ask one question. Who has actually 
> >implemented the PSVI? Sorry, my mistake. I should astart 
> with, who has 
> >implemented the XML infoset?
> 
> The XML Schema Working Group has been looking at several (I 
> think 3) vendor 
> APIs for accessing the PSVI, and considering whether 
> specifying a PSVI API 
> is a good idea. I think that idea is on hold right now (I 
> have taken over a 
> month off of the Schema WG, but intend to get back to it).
> 
> That's an indication that there are at least 3 
> implementations, since there 
> are APIs to access them.
> 

Can you please name any of these 3 implementations so I can take a look
at them? I personally have not seen an implementation that allows one
access to the [validation context], [validity], [schema normalized
value] or [validation attempted] properties of an attribute information
item in an XML document. 

Please point me to an implementation that supports all the PSVI
contributions to an XML infoset as specified in the W3C XML Schema
structures recommendation. 

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Two wrongs are only the beginning.
 
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 
You assume all risk for your use. (c) 2002 Microsoft Corporation. All
rights reserved.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: PSVI formalization
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: PSVI formalization
• Next by Date: RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Previous by thread: RE: PSVI formalization
• Next by thread: RE: PSVI formalization
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread