|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: a standards story
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > -----Original Message----- > From: Elliotte Rusty Harold [mailto:elharo@m...] > > At 10:39 AM -0400 5/17/02, Simon St.Laurent wrote: > > > >Imagine the consternation when the dozen or so participants > >realized that EVERY National Body had voted "NO", and, > >moreover, with NO constructive comments! The approach was seen > >as too complex, too ad hoc, and (because it still left > >everything requiring an > integral number > >of octets) insufficient to produce efficient encodings of > things like > >"SEQUENCE OF BOOLEAN". It was quite clearly dead in the water. > > > > What strikes me as most interesting about this is that people > outside the working group effectively had veto power over the > spec. If it had been left to merely the group producing the spec > to decide when it was done, this would not have happened. I can > think of at least two major W3C specs that would possibly have > been vetoed if people > outside the working group were allowed to vote, I thought that, the AC reps and ultimately the W3C director decree what gets to recommendation status. Bill de hÓra -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 7.0.4 iQA/AwUBPOUyseaWiFwg2CH4EQLSkQCfbtZDqHY4xUNDVOkruRCHdOZ3HV0AoJ5d x/j4UfV5MWISaWO6uv5OjMlJ =x1N0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








