[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ?

• To: "Evan Lenz" <evan@e...>
• Subject: Re: How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ?
• From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 08:19:52 -0600
• Cc: "Jeni Tennison" <jeni@j...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: Message from "Evan Lenz" <evan@e...> of "Tue, 14 May 2002 01:14:55 PDT." <NDBBLMPNADEOOKGELJALEEBMCJAA.evan@e...>
• Sender: uche.ogbuji@f...

> Uche Ogbuji wrote:
> > A process-xinclude option for output is also a good idea.  The
> > tricky bit is that XInclude requires an infoset and XSLT can
> > produce output without a corresponding infoset (i.e. multiple
> > root elements).
> 
> Isn't this in principle just as tricky for the input, since input has the
> same characteristic? That's a question I guess you'll have to address should
> you decide to support EGPE parsing for source trees in 4XSLT :-)

Yes, it would be tricky.  I think we'd have to turn off XInclude processing in the case of source as EGPE.

I agree with Jeni that XInclude should consider relaxing the proper infoset requirement in order to allow XInclude processing in EGPE documents.


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                                    Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net    http://4Suite.org    http://fourthought.com
Track chair, XML/Web Services One (San Jose, Boston): http://www.xmlconference.com/
DAML Reference - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/05/01/damlref.html
The Languages of the Semantic Web - http://www.newarchitectmag.com/documents/s=2453/new1020218556549/index.html
XML, The Model Driven Architecture, and RDF @ XML Europe - http://www.xmleurope.com/2002/kttrack.asp#themodel

• References:
  • RE: How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ?
    • From: "Evan Lenz" <evan@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
• Next by Date: Fwd: (void) XML [expletive deleted]
• Previous by thread: RE: How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ?
• Next by thread: Re: How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread