|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: RE: working with text (was RE: XPath 1.5?)
> Simon St. Laurent: > Once again, is this a criticism of the whole notion of associating an XML > document with a schema, or with XSD itself? Speaking for myself, I have absolutely no problem whatsoever with the general idea of using a schema. Indeed I think it is good practice to declare the classes of valid XML. My problem is with XSDL. And even if XSDL were near perfect, I think it would still be a bad idea to weld its constructs into the heart of every other XML spec. > I haven't even read the XPath 2.0 spec yet. It looked pretty scary coming > out of the printer just now. But the tight integration of XSD with other > specs, which frightens me, shouldn't be confused with the overall potential > of XML schema to enable a whole new class of XML processing apps. Total passionate agreement. -- Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc. http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com Track chair, XML/Web Services One (San Jose, Boston): http://www.xmlconference.com/ DAML Reference - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/05/01/damlref.html RDF Query using Versa - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-think10/index.html XML, The Model Driven Architecture, and RDF @ XML Europe - http://www.xmleurope.com/2002/kttrack.asp#themodel
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








