[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: AN N: RES

  • To: "'Simon St.Laurent'" <simonstl@s...>, xml-dev@l...
  • Subject: RE: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: AN N: RESTTutorial)
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 12:22:36 -0500

RE: RE:  Painful USA Today article (was RE:  AN N: RES

From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...]

>To the extent that customers buy technology by wandering through a
>checkbox-list of features, it doesn't work.  

They issue an RFP describing the features of system they 
want to purchase.  We respond to that with capabilities 
we provide.  That works.

>Telling customers "no, that's bad for you" is something that 
>needs to happen more often.

Could be.  Try to do that in an RFP reponse or a BAFO.  Be 
very careful of telling a customer that their business is 
bad for them.   We do a good job of declining requirements 
we can't meet or know are not effectively met with our system 
as described in their requirements.  We do a good job of offering 
alternatives.   We pick technologies that make that doable 
and implement them for specific requirements generalized 
in the application itself.   We don't sell XML; we implement 
XML applications.  As far as XML tools go, I am your customer.

>I wish it was that simple.  An application is good for chopping down
>technologies to fit that application, but the prospect of multiple
>applications leads to feature creep - all those use cases must be
>answered.  

Yes.

>XML 1.0 did a wonderful job of saying "these are our goals" rather than
>"these are our use cases", and that actually worked.  Now that the use
>cases are back on the scene with claims of "our customers want to do
>XYZ", the features are piling on.

Yes.

>I'm not content with selling the world an enormous mash of features and
>possible combinations of features and leaving it to developers of
>particular applications to sort out which parts are valuable and which
>are trash.
 
They have to sort out which features will solve a problem for them 
and which are not of use to a particular application.  You can't do 
that for them.  I am your customer.

len

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.