[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: RESTTuto

• To: "Betty Harvey" <harvey@e...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: RESTTutorial)
• From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>
• Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 12:17:19 -0700
• Thread-index: AcIA3ezgsWtMMHsyQ/2JnaoHJrqkoAAHa24A
• Thread-topic: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: RESTTutorial)

> deeper into the problem.  One quote I thought could correlate directly
> with what we are seeing with XML specifications and technologies:
> 
>    'But companies don't always need what they get. "They overbuy
>    and get more features, more functions than they need," says
>    analyst David Smith of Gartner'
> 
> History keeps repeating itself!

On the other hand, the availability of tools and products for XML has
lagged pretty badly, making it hard for the progress-minded CEO to find
things to spend money on.  The complication in the specs only makes it
more difficult for vendors to produce products that people can overbuy.
:-)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN:RESTTutorial)
    • From: Betty Harvey <harvey@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ?
• Next by Date: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN:RESTTutorial)
• Previous by thread: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: REST Tutorial)
• Next by thread: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN:RESTTutorial)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread