[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Objections to / uses of PSVI?

• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,"xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 17:10:36 -0700
• Thread-index: AcH7pGDdL9xvBbyHSyyR6ueGdFQm4AAAFz4w
• Thread-topic: Objections to / uses of PSVI?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 5:12 PM
> To: xml-dev
> Subject: Re:  Objections to / uses of PSVI?
> 
> 
> > 3) Validation information. Other than wasting space, my 
> guess is that 
> > virtually everybody will ignore this. It seems that the only people 
> > who would be interested are a very small group of 
> applications such as 
> > validators and editors who want to tell the user where 
> their document 
> > is invalid.
> 
> I don't have much trouble with anyone doing yes-no validity, 
> whatever toolset they choose.  Keeping that information 
> around?  Error messages and warnings in attributes seem appropriate.
> 
> The more exciting flip-side to this is issues of partial 
> validity.  Rick Jelliffe's pretty convincing on the 
> possibilities of both partial validity and partial 
> well-formedness, but it's kind of a dark area that specs 
> don't seem to want to ponder too deeply.
> 

The PSVI items that have to do with validation are poorly thought out,
inefficient to implement and of questionable use to anyone. 

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
The meek shall inherit the earth because the bold will get the house.
 
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 
You assume all risk for your use. (c) 2002 Microsoft Corporation. All
rights reserved.

• Prev by Date: Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• Next by Date: Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• Previous by thread: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• Next by thread: Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread