[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: PSVI formalization

• To: "Joe English" <jenglish@f...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: PSVI formalization
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 15:35:16 -0700
• Thread-index: AcH3ob2EvrYUBkoSQ+SSEzpSxoPMcQAB7Nvg
• Thread-topic: PSVI formalization

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe English [mailto:jenglish@f...] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:33 PM
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re:  PSVI formalization
> 
> 
> 
> Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> 
> > All this talk of PSVI leads me to ask one question. Who has 
> actually 
> > implemented the PSVI? Sorry, my mistake. I should astart 
> with, who has 
> > implemented the XML infoset?
> 
> Any parser with a SAX driver implements it.  Any DOM or 
> DOM-like library implements it.
> 
> I've implemented XML infosets myself, several times in fact. 
> (Although never the complete collection of information items 
> listed in the Infoset REC; there have always been a few bits 
> that were irrelevant to the implementation and left out.)
> 
> 

From reading both your comments and does of Jonathan Robie, I guess no
one actually implements either the PSVI or the Infoset to the letter of
their respective recommendations. So what exactly are people in the
various threads arguing about PSVI talking about then? Some magic PSVI
that was discussed in an offlist email thread, conference call and chain
letter?  

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Two wrongs are only the beginning.
 
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 
You assume all risk for your use. (c) 2002 Microsoft Corporation. All
rights reserved.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: PSVI formalization
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • RE: PSVI formalization
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Next by Date: RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Previous by thread: RE: PSVI formalization
• Next by thread: RE: PSVI formalization
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread