Re: Call for example of server enabled for XML multiplereprese
[Bjoern Hoehrmann] > > >If on the other hand the following request is sent: > > > >GET /myfolder/mydoc.xml HTTP/1.1 > >host: www.mydomain.com > >accept: text/html > > > >The server replies with an HTML representation of this XML > >document. > > Does not make sense to me, if I want to publish a document, I use XHTML, > if I want to publish a vector graphic, I use SVG. Having the same > content in XHTML and SVG seems to be inappropriate use of one of these > technologies. > If I wanted to send a gipped document but the receiver can't dealt with it,then I should send the unzipped version. If I want to send an image in svg but the receiver can only handle png or gif, I should send one of those types. I think that's the idea behind the "accept" header. Makes sense to me. Cheers, Tom P
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format