[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Re: I can XInclude where I bloody want to

• To: <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Subject: RE: Re: I can XInclude where I bloody want to
• From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@b...>
• Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 13:54:23 +0300
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcHxxtDlcEq8D+XzSdS2kP9c8usr/gAABgoA
• Thread-topic: Re: I can XInclude where I bloody want to

> From: Michael Kay [mailto:michael.h.kay@n...] 

> I always thought the <?xml-stylesheet?> processing 
> instruction was a bad
> idea anyway, data should not define its own presentation rules even
> indirectly.

From another point of view, it's just inline metadata: "If you know what
xml-stylesheet is, then may want to know my creator has provided this
style for reason X".

The main problem is, neither the metadata (ok, the PI) or the client
know what reason X is about.

Manos

• Prev by Date: RE: Diff between Character reference and Entity Ref.
• Next by Date: Re: Re: I can XInclude where I bloody want to
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: I can XInclude where I bloody want to
• Next by thread: XML updates on xml.startkabel
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread