[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: SAX and Pull options: was: Penance for misspent attributes

• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: SAX and Pull options: was: Penance for misspent attributes
• From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>
• Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 14:55:13 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <001101c20098$37f33570$a3eab8c3@m...>

 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Miles Sabin [mailto:miles@m...] 
>
>
> so isn't this just a recapitulation of the SAX API, but with 
> an unnecessary detour through XPP? 

Yep, with decent state management, XPP is a detour. I take the
argument that it's easy to understand, but the typecodes...Anyway
if XPP is going to be standard, this is surely preferable to
exposing typecodes, token objects notwithstanding, which is where
I'm going with StartTag, EndTag etc. XPP needs to look at
tokenization more closely.

Bill de hÓra



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4

iQA/AwUBPOpPZOaWiFwg2CH4EQKHcQCfaI7xLGsZk+hSvaqEF/lNwdnBBhEAn0g+
qn6k1ausPW4x8460z1riuyNE
=vJ6N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• References:
  • RE: SAX and Pull options: was: Penance for misspent attributes
    • From: "Miles Sabin" <miles@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ANN: REST Tutorial
• Next by Date: RE: SAX and Pull options: was: Penance for misspent attributes
• Previous by thread: RE: SAX and Pull options: was: Penance for misspent attributes
• Next by thread: Re: RE: Penance for misspent attributes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread