|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Patent non-proliferation and disarmament
"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" scripsit: > If I personally had to pay a toll for every site I visited, > I agree, it would not have taken off. But I don't do that > for listening to the radio. Someone does. The problem here > is that a business model for "free content" wasn't required > to start the web. It may be required for some content markets. The TV (and radio) business is much like the chicken business: the chickens only *think* it's all being done for their benefit. In fact, the real customers are hidden, and the chickens only get whatever will barely keep them alive (watching/listening). > RAND says, "these are the terms under which you may > use my property in your standard". Actually, it doesn't: that would be something between RAND and RF. RAND only says that the terms for you_1 will be the same as the terms for you_2, but as for reasonableness, what is that? Why, whatever the patent owner thinks reasonable, viz. whatever the traffic will bear. Classic rent seeking. > The real problem is "unreasonable" patents As long as the customers of the patent offices are the filers of patents, the number of "unreasonable" patents can only grow. They have forgotten that they are supposed to be acting in the public interest, being caught by the Invisible Foot (excellent article, BTW, what parts of it I understood). -- John Cowan <jcowan@r...> http://www.reutershealth.com I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








