|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
On Tue, 2002-05-07 at 09:42, Michael Kay wrote: > As you know, Jeni, I would personally have preferred to bite off a smaller > problem for the current XPath round. But the time for that was at the > requirements phase, and it's very hard to change course now, when we appear > at last to be making progress towards the goal. Someone is going to have to > do some serious lobbying to get a change in the objectives, it isn't going > to happen as a result of grumbling on this list. No, the W3C is not going to change its objectives as a result of grumbling on this list, unless those grumbling are W3C members with a lot of clout. However, that doesn't mean that XPath 1.5 or something like it is impossible, or even that the committee's work is irrelevant to those of us who disgree with some of its objectives. It seems clear that there is useful functionality in XPath 2.0 that does not require the strong typing approach. Some of this functionality is already available in extensions (EXSLT, for instance), but some of it is new. Merely reading the draft in its current form is a pretty difficult task, but that may be something that can be helped. How about working on a "type-free guide to XPath 2.0" as a first step? Rather than creating another specification while XPath 2.0 is still in flux, the guide could point developers to the parts of XPath 2.0 that aren't deeply bonded to strong typing, perhaps with some gray area indicated for cases that aren't completely clear. This could be something the WG itself could contribute to, depending on how friendly it was feeling to such an effort. Users and implementors of XPath could explore XPath 2.0 through the guide with less concern over grasping the entire specification, and use it as a basis for integrating their work with new XPath features. Done right, it could serve as a nice transition piece between 1.0 and 2.0 as well. A few readers might even be dazzled by the full glory of XPath 2.0, if such a thing is possible. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








