|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[Recent Entries]
[Reply To This Message]
RE: XQuery types was Re: Yet another plea for XUpdat
Jonathan Borden wrote:
> I
> don't mean to be condescending, but it is hard to have a meaningful
> converstation unless we agree on a few principles.
I don't have a computer science education (working on that now), but what
Dare said about XQuery makes complete sense to me. I hardly think this
requires a discussion of logic and where we got the word "type". You should
consider that terms in computer science do not always correspond directly to
terms in abstract logic. I get the feeling you're not really listening to
what Dare's saying; instead you're trying to cast his use of various terms
into the mold you learned in Logic 101. That seems like a surefire way to
delay meaningful discussion.
Evan
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
 |
| Atom 0.3 |
 |
| |
Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats,
enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.
|
Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website.
they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please
click here.
|
|
Cart
