[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
• From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 03:50:30 -0700
• References: <NDBBLMPNADEOOKGELJALMEBICJAA.evan@e...> <200205130917.KAA23038@p...> <1181819988344.20020513112423@j...> <3CE0BC43.463779A6@r...> <1701905546320.20020514111022@j...>

Jeni Tennison wrote:

> XSLT stylesheets control both the core XSLT processing and the default
> behaviour of an XSLT application (through the xsl:output element), and
> I think it should continue to do so (though making the distinction
> clearer would be a good thing, in my opinion).

In my ignorance of XSLT, I didn't realize this was the case. It strikes
me as conflating two completely different things but, given the success
of XSLT, it's hard to argue that this is the wrong decision from a user
point of view.

-- Ron

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
    • From: "Evan Lenz" <evan@e...>

• References:
  • RE: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
    • From: "Evan Lenz" <evan@e...>
  • Re: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
    • From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>
  • Re: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
  • Re: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
    • From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>

• Prev by Date: RE: How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ?
• Next by Date: RE: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
• Previous by thread: Re: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
• Next by thread: RE: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread