|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
At 6:11 PM +1000 4/4/02, Marcus Carr wrote: > DTDs are unable to play with namespaces, so they are not capable of > fully supporting the v1.1 recommendation. Ergo, DTDs should be dropped > as they have been rendered incomplete and confusing. > Your premise is false. DTDs are able to play with namespaces. The syntax isn't elegant but it does work. Either the DTDs must declare the prefixed names or the prefixes must be parameterized. XHTML, MathML, and many other XML applications use these techniques. DTDs are not fundamentally incompatible with namespaces. The way I opften express it when motivating schemas is that DTDs are only "marginally compatible" with namespaces. However, for purposes of the current discussion tghhe difference between marginally compatible and incompatible is huge. -- +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) | | http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/bible2/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








