[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: WD for Namespaces 1.1

RE:  WD for Namespaces 1.1
If the change is made, only 3 is acceptable.  
Orphaning systems, content, and users is a 
bad policy.

The change should be complete or not at all. 
We've struggled long enough with half-hearted, 
half-done work in the name of minimalism.


-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Kay [mailto:michael.h.kay@n...]

> Is there a good argument why Namespaces-1.1 *shouldn't* be rolled
> into the XML-1.1 req/draft?

The message I get from the discussion is that no-one wants a new version of
the core XML specs unless it fixes some of the significant problems with the
current specs. I don't agree with Richard Tobin's policy (only do the things
that can be done quickly), because it means there isn't enough benefit in
the new version to justify the pain of having multiple versions around.


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.