RE: [good] Question about NS 1.1
> Amelia A Lewis wrote: > > > Here's a proposal for XML 1.1 + Namespaces 1.1: namespace > declarations are > > decreed not to apply to attribute or element content (listen for the > > screams). An application that wants something of that sort > gets to invent > > its own attributes or elements to create the definitions, > if it wants to > > store QNames in element or attribute content. > > I'm ambivalent about this. QNames in content sound like a > Really Bad Idea on the face of it, but on the other hand > of all the RECs to come out of the W3C, XSLT is the only > one in which namespace issues don't cause a tremendous > headache to end users. It shifts all the pain onto XSLT > implementors (thanks, Mike :-). > > I'm not sure how this could be accomplished without QNames > in content. > It could have been achieved using an application-level namespace declaration xsl:ns="some.uri". But it's too late now. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@n... work: Michael.Kay@s...
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format