[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 12:04:03 -0800
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEEAE4@HQ5> <4.3.2.7.2.20020405081622.00b63c90@m...>

Ann Navarro wrote:
> 
> At 03:57 PM 4/4/2002 -0800, Ronald Bourret wrote:
> >But that's just it. Every system layer above them does depend on them.
> >Adding them to the core is just formalizing the status quo.
> 
> They do? I guess I better go tell my clients that their systems are broken,
> and they don't even know it (not a one of them *depends* on namespaces)

Maybe I wasn't clear enough. What I meant is that all W3C XML
technologies except the XML 1.0 spec itself use namespaces. (Please
correct me if I'm wrong.) Just because you don't use namespaces doesn't
mean they aren't there.

-- Ron

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• References:
  • RE: RE: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• Prev by Date: RE: content model question
• Next by Date: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Previous by thread: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Next by thread: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread