|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Can you stand yet another SOAP-RPC vs HTTP GET question?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > In procedural languages you say *how* to do things. In > functional languages you say *what* you want. For instance, > languages like Visual Basic are procedural language because > you specify to the system a sequence of actions to perform, > something like "display", "calculate", "store", "recall". In > the case of functional language, you do not have to say > "display" you specify what you want as final result. For > instance by specifying a template. There are also other more > subtle elements to consider but these two elements catch the > essential spirit of procedural vs. functional or the > opposition of "how" vs. "what". In one case you tell the > system what kind of action to perform, in the other case you > specify what you want as final result. > > Off course, Visual basic is a strange beast since you > visually specify the visual end result by placing components > in a form. And this could be considered as specifying "what" > we want in terms of visual layout [1]. So probably we would > have to use a more precise definition for both concepts. Sounds more like declarative versus procedural. C is procedural, Prolog is declarative. XML-RPC is proceduralish, XSLT is declarativish. Functional programming normally means programming without assignments. Bill de hÓra -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 7.0.4 iQA/AwUBPMPAoOaWiFwg2CH4EQJQKACg9v/ViIgejrosytXWtVy8BD2jaHUAn30j XqbHvC1nYJfRYuefw3rNKWrz =oMOS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








