RE: XHTML survival rate?
At 8:23 AM -0500 4/11/02, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: >Rick has it right. When the decision to >make a Draconian Parse the centerpiece of XML >to support a well-formed core, one remark made >by the a supporter was that this would ensure the >clean up of malformed HTML. A counter argument was >that that approach sounded good but that practical >programmers would still handle the errors and >go on because that is what customers would want. >In hindsight, the counter argument has so far >been right with regards to HTML. A significant reason for draconian error handling was the direct request of vendors of some notable HTML processors, who admitted the problems in HTML practice encouraged by their software, and asked for draconian error handling on that account. It was a "please stop me before I kill again" kind of argument.... Everyone in the group recognized that standards are a weak constraint on behavior, and that the solution might be partial, or take years to affect practice significantly. -- David -- ------------------------------- David Durand | 12 Bassett St. david.durand@i... | Providence RI, 02903-4628 USA VP, Software Architecture | 401-331-2014 x111 Cell: 401-935-5317 ingenta plc | FAX: 401-331-2015 http://www.ingenta.com/
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format