[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Naive Question about NS 1.1

• To: <michael.h.kay@n...>,"'Jeff Rafter'" <jeffrafter@d...>,"'xml-dev'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Naive Question about NS 1.1
• From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@i...>
• Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 10:38:30 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <002b01c1e00d$4dee3ce0$6501a8c0@pcukmka>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Kay [mailto:michael.h.kay@n...]
> Sent: 09 April 2002 22:27
> To: 'Jeff Rafter'; 'Leigh Dodds'; 'xml-dev'
> Subject: RE:  Naive Question about NS 1.1
> 
>...
> No. In the Infoset, an Element Information Item has a property called
> Namespace Name, which gives you the namespace URI part of the element's
> name. You only need the in-scope namespaces property if you want to find a
> prefix associated with that namespace URI, or if you want to find the
> namespace URI associated with a prefix that appears somewhere other than in
> an element or attribute name.

I think it's only the latter, as each element information item [1] also has a 
prefix property. Or am I missing something?

Cheers,

L.

[1]. http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset/#infoitem.element
[2]. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-infoset-comments/2001JanMar/0074.html

-- 
Leigh Dodds, Research Group, Ingenta | "Pluralitas non est ponenda
http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic |    sine necessitate"
http://www.xml.com/pub/xmldeviant    |     -- William of Ockham

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Naive Question about NS 1.1
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• References:
  • RE: Naive Question about NS 1.1
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: XML from java
• Next by Date: RE: XML from java
• Previous by thread: RE: Naive Question about NS 1.1
• Next by thread: RE: Naive Question about NS 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread