Re: Compiled XML
Mike Champion wrote: > In general, though, you would be well-advised to not try to compress > arbitrary text better than gzip can. You'll fail. http://sources.redhat.com/bzip2/index.html is gradually gaining wider acceptance and distribution. I'd say it's where gzip was in 1993-94. It's a little more CPU intensive but is also consistently better than gzip. Coincidentally with the recent discussions on xml-dev, I see the author is a functional programming fan :) - Mike ____________________________________________________________________________ mike j. brown | xml/xslt: http://skew.org/xml/ denver/boulder, colorado, usa | resume: http://skew.org/~mike/resume/
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format