[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn't dese rveits

Re:  Stupid Question (was RE:  XML doesn't dese	rveits
[Nicolas LEHUEN]
Plus, of course, the child object can add a new method which gives access to
the new data model, and this method will be used by callers that rely on the
new schema.

That's why I believe OOP can provide useful insights in bringing the X to

No argument from me about this.  Remember, though, that we can remove
structures that are in ancestor types and elements when we derive new ones -
XML Schema supports doing so, for example  - which we can't with standard OO
methodologies.  In this way, XML markup can be considered richer than OO


Tom P


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.