[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


But will the porn sites classify themselves as Sales (enter your credit card
nr to view more), Interactive (virtual intercourse I guess), Multimedia
(flesh, not flash), Links to information (more dirty sites), Personal ("our
models"), or "Information", especially if they throw everything on the same
page ? You know, porn is always the litmus test of technology, so much so
that I'm surprised we never saw any PornML vocabulary until now - at least
Google doesn't find it. Now that's a business idea.

Alain.
---
Alain Rogister
CTO
http://www.ubiquity.be

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
To: <xml-dev@l...>
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 3:28 PM
Subject:  The Aesop Metatag


> For those that like simple approaches, here is a
> simple approach to web page classification.
>
> http://www.g21.net/mem72.html
>
> This is a nice test for the 80/20 predictor meme.
>
> len
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
>



Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member