• To: 'Dare Obasanjo' <dareo@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn't dese rve its "X".)
• From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 10:32:43 -0800

> ... What I'd like to see are examples and design 
> patterns that show how subtitution groups and abstract types 
> can be used to build polymorphic apps that adapt well to 
> schema evolution. 

I think that's an excellent suggestion for an addition to the Best Practices
web site[1]. There's already some coverage there on Schema versioning
(thanks, Priscilla); Schema robusting(?) would go hand-in-hand with that. I
offer some thoughts on that subject in soon-to-be published book
<?whoTooted?>, but an open discussion of tried and true approaches would
certainly educate us all.

[1] http://www.xfront.com/BestPracticesHomepage.html
[2] http://www.manning.com/lowery/index.html

• Prev by Date: Re: XML faster than mySQL database ?
• Next by Date: RE: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn't dese rve its "X".)
• Previous by thread: RE: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn't dese rve its "X".)
• Next by thread: RE: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn't dese rve its "X".)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread