• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>
• Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 16:23:50 -0000
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <575CBD83AE7DD411A23500B0D049C2F9C076E9@SRVSOCRATE>

 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> Nicolas LEHUEN:
>
> I mean, I can handle schema evolution. There is nothing that 
> can't be solved by (re)writing code... But I'd rather write 
> some code that would be less expensive to maintain when the 
> schema changes, or code that can still operate in a coherent 
> way when presented with a document following the new schema. 
> Note that rejecting a document for fear that something wrong 
> could be performed is coherent, too (think about 
> http://www.ge.com/services/nuclear/plantcontrol.wsdl).
 
It's a pity that eBT's "Engenda" CMS core XML data structures
aren't in the public domain. Gavin Nichol et al did a good job on
managing change and extensibility there.

Bill de hÓra

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4

iQA/AwUBPITxEuaWiFwg2CH4EQJI5wCgyDL0CkpBhs/MIQrQCmwkmCdg0SYAoJ3E
y8vAXId+mlsjhaU00wu+C8Rc
=imd5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• References:
  • RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
    • From: Nicolas LEHUEN <nicolas.lehuen@u...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• Next by Date: RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• Previous by thread: RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• Next by thread: RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread