Re: W3C XML Schema Test Collection
From: "Michael Brennan" <Michael_Brennan@A...> > This is one area where Schematron shines. Definitely. > However, I will say that I think it would be great if we had some > lightweight standards for specific annotations that could be used to support > tools -- e.g. tooltip text, diagnostic messages for invalid constructs, and > XLinks pointing to documentation. The trouble with xs:documentation is that there are no conventions for whether to put plain text or html in there. This gives us a half-baked system that relies on tool makers to do the right thing. The right thing seems to be that schema systems should cope with each of the following cases: i) xs:documentation is a form of html:p ii) xs:documentation is a form of xhtml:div iii) xs:documentation contains some proprietary elements Personally, I think ii) is the best convention. But I see many schemas that just stick in simple text comments. Cheers Rick Jelliffe
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format