Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
From: "Michael Brennan" <Michael_Brennan@A...> > This is one area where Schematron shines. Definitely. > However, I will say that I think it would be great if we had some > lightweight standards for specific annotations that could be used to support > tools -- e.g. tooltip text, diagnostic messages for invalid constructs, and > XLinks pointing to documentation. The trouble with xs:documentation is that there are no conventions for whether to put plain text or html in there. This gives us a half-baked system that relies on tool makers to do the right thing. The right thing seems to be that schema systems should cope with each of the following cases: i) xs:documentation is a form of html:p ii) xs:documentation is a form of xhtml:div iii) xs:documentation contains some proprietary elements Personally, I think ii) is the best convention. But I see many schemas that just stick in simple text comments. Cheers Rick Jelliffe
|
