• Subject: Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 22:33:04 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <000c01c1d03d$e8df3810$655169d5@pcukmka>

Michael Kay wrote:

> Yes. I think Schema has definitely fallen into the trap of being too formal.
> The XML and XSLT specifications are woefully informal (and therefore
> ambiguous) in places, but the implementations have a very high level of
> interoperability.

Worse yet, it's only the style that is formal. In many places the words
themselves are quite ambiguous.

-- Ron

• References:
  • RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Next by Date: Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Previous by thread: Formal specifications (was: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?)
• Next by thread: RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread