• To: michael.h.kay@n...
• Subject: Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 14:39:32 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: John.Atchley@f... ('Atchley John'), xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <000c01c1d03d$e8df3810$655169d5@pcukmka> from "Michael Kay" at Mar 20, 2002 06:34:45 PM

Michael Kay scripsit:

> Yes. I think Schema has definitely fallen into the trap of being too formal.

Formal != obscure.  The RELAX NG specification is quite formal, but not
at all obscure; indeed, one can for the most part skip the formal parts
and still make sense of it.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@s...>

• References:
  • RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Next by Date: RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Previous by thread: Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Next by thread: Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread