• To: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Processing Model
• From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@i...>
• Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 09:20:31 -0000
• Importance: Normal

To follow up on Rick's posting yesterday, I'll mention that this 
weeks XML-Deviant covers the issue of the XML Processing Model [1].

In the space of time between my writing the article and it 
being published, the TAG have produced the minutes to 
the Processing Model Workshop [2] -- which goes some way towards 
addressing my complaint that the issue didn't seem to be getting 
visible attention.

I was also encouraged to see Rick's unofficial comments to the TAG [3], 
hoping that W3C and ISO can co-ordinate their efforts.

Cheers,

L.

[1]. http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/03/13/processing-model.html
[2]. http://www.w3.org/XML/2001/07/xmlpm-minutes.html
[3]. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Mar/0041.html


-- 
Leigh Dodds, Research Group, Ingenta | "Pluralitas non est ponenda
http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic |    sine necessitate"
http://www.xml.com/pub/xmldeviant    |     -- William of Ockham

• Prev by Date: Re: <ged.corba.Node>
• Next by Date: RE: <ged.corba.Node>
• Previous by thread: RE: Xperanto
• Next by thread: RE: Re: Pipelines : inside or outside the parser ? (was RE: Java Technology and XML : API benchmark)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread