RE: A good case for namespace URIs
As I've written in private to John, the worst problem is not that there is nothing at the end of the namespace URI, but that nothing can be found using Google + people brains ability to perform fuzzy searches. If a human can't find its way on the govtalk web site in hours of searching, how do you expect something to be performed automatically by a computer ? Namespace URI resolving is not the solution to a badly structured web site. One cannot expect an index to solve a structural problem in the data it indexes. Regards, Nicolas >-----Message d'origine----- >De : Andy Greener [mailto:andy@g...] >Envoye : lundi 4 mars 2002 18:34 >A : xml-dev@l... >Objet : RE: A good case for namespace URIs > > >At 4:32 pm +0100 4/3/02, Nicolas LEHUEN wrote: >>Well, I must say that I don't know govtalk at all, so for me, >the fact that >>http://www.govtalk.gov.uk/CR/core is not referenced anywhere >in the Govtalk >>schema documentation is rather strange. That's the real >problem, not the >>fact that resolving the schema URI gives a 404. I don't think >this proves >>anything. > >The problem might be that the URI is actually >http://www.govtalk.gov.uk/CM/core, >though I admit that doesn't explain the general difficulty in >finding things on >the GovTalk web site! > >The GovTalk developers, and UK govt departments in their turn, >have adopted >the govtalk URI for a consistent naming scheme for UK >government Schemas. >Thus there is .../CM/core, .../CM/envelope, >.../CM/errorresponse and a whole >bunch in .../taxation, as well as others. None of these >resolve to Schemas, >web pages or RDDL docs. > >They (/we - because I'm partly responsible for the 'taxation' >portion of this >namespace) have taken the Spec at its word and chosen not to >place anything >there to resolve (reasons on a postcard please....). I find it >as infuriating >as John sometimes, but unfortunately although Inland Revenue >are encouraged >to be consistent, I/we have no jurisdiction over that domain >so I can't do >very much about it. > >I'm not sure what the right answer is (e.g. Schema source or >RDDL) but I do >know one thing - having nothing there is the worst of all >possible worlds... >-- > >Andy Greener Mob: +44 7836 331933 >GID Ltd, Reading, UK Tel: +44 118 956 1248 >andy@g... Fax: +44 118 958 9005 > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an >initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > >The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > >To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription >manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl> >
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format