RE: RELAX NG Marketing (was RE: Do Names Matt er?)
I'm not specifically complaining about memory usage. I was making comparison of JAR file sizes not to compare memory usage (which is not related to JAR file size, anyway), but to show that the difference between a 100 kb SAX2 parser and the 1.77 Mb of JARs in Xerces 2.0.1 is symptomatic of a project that seriously cross functional boundaries and tries to do it all in one single place. I'm not complaining about bloated base classes, I'm complaining about projects that force me to either use the full monty, or nothing (because of dependencies between validation and parsing, for example). AFAIC, for Xerces-J, I chose to use nothing. Regards, Nicolas Lehuen >-----Message d'origine----- >De : Daniel Veillard [mailto:veillard@r...] >Envoye : mercredi 27 mars 2002 15:58 >A : Nicolas LEHUEN >Cc : 'Matthew Gertner'; 'James Clark'; 'xml-dev@l...' >Objet : Re: RELAX NG Marketing (was RE: Do Names >Matt er?) > > >On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:42:02PM +0100, Nicolas LEHUEN wrote: >> As for the performance aspects of Java, I won't enter the >debate, thank you >> :). > > Reread my message. Was it about performances ? No it's about memory >footprint. I read your message, complaing long and loudly >about your base >classes being bloated, and on the other hand only considered Java >as the possible programming platform. Either you care about the memory >(and cache ...) usage or not, make up your mind. > >Daniel > >-- >Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ >veillard@r... | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit >http://xmlsoft.org/ >http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ >
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format