Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
Jonathan Robie wrote: > > > > 3. In places where the spec is not clear, or where you as an implementor of > > > XML Schema find it difficult to implement, let's see some email traffic > > > sent to XML Schema. > > > >In all honesty, will this do any good? > > I am not sure whether you are asking only whether point 3 will do any good. Yes. I think the other points are good ideas. I simply think point 3 doesn't go far enough. > 2. Pointing out ambiguities and bugs in the XML Schema spec will also > clearly help. These are taken very seriously, and they really are resolved. I have no doubt they are taken seriously and that fixing them is better than nothing, but it's still just stuffing old newspapers into the cracks of a rickety building. > I don't find XML Schema graceful or beautiful, but I do think it is useful, Agreed. Actually, XML Schemas are graceful in places -- complex types especially. > [snip] > > Let's > make sure XML Schema is as useful as possible! One reason to make the spec readable :) -- Ron
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format