• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: CDATA vs. Escaped characters
• From: Mike Brown <mike@s...>
• Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 18:36:21 -0700 (MST)
• In-reply-to: <200203211944.g2LJiJu22608@l...>"from Uche Ogbuji at Mar 21, 2002 12:44:19 pm"

Uche Ogbuji wrote:
> > Using <doc>foo<![CDATA[bar]]>baz</doc>, the DOM gives you 3 children of
> > element 'doc' ...or in SAX, 3 separate calls to characters():
>                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Sorry to nit-pick, but this doesn't necessarily have to be so.

Yes. Actually in a previous draft of that part of the message, I was careful
to use the words 'may' and 'might', but I think in the end I accidentally
sacrificed some accuracy for a more authoritative tone.

   - Mike
____________________________________________________________________________
  mike j. brown                   |  xml/xslt: http://skew.org/xml/
  denver/boulder, colorado, usa   |  resume: http://skew.org/~mike/resume/
                                             ^ yes, looking for work

• References:
  • Re: CDATA vs. Escaped characters
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: RE: MSXML DOM Special Chars Less Than 32
• Next by Date: Using Xerces C++ Libraries
• Previous by thread: Re: CDATA vs. Escaped characters
• Next by thread: RE: CDATA vs. Escaped characters
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread