• To: jonathan.robie@s... (Jonathan Robie)
• Subject: Re: Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 15:00:44 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: kk@k... (Kohsuke Kawaguchi), rpbourret@r... (Ronald Bourret), xml-dev@l..., www-xml-schema-comments@w...
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20020321114756.0753d218@157.189.161.214> from "Jonathan Robie" at Mar 21, 2002 12:32:31 PM

Jonathan Robie scripsit:

> Here are some of the advantages of XML Schema:
> 
> 1. For most people who use schemas, what they really need is datatypes. 
> Otherwise, DTDs would meet most of their needs. Having the same set of 
> built-in datatypes across all XML Schema implementations is a very good 
> thing, IMHO.

As you know but others may not, RELAX NG does support the concept of
datatypes, and current RNG implementations in fact support Schema datatypes.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• References:
  • Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: CDATA vs. Escaped characters
• Next by Date: RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Next by thread: Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread