RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
There is a good article about web services and the use of XSD vis a vis coupling at XML.COM this week. http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/03/20/endpoints.html I can't agree with this: "And though the SOAP specification doesn't mandate the use of HTTP, it is crucially important as a transport protocol because the entire Internet infrastructure is designed to support it because the Internet is bigger than HTTP and alternatives to it should be a subject of careful experimentation just as substitutes for XSD are. That said, while I have to agree with the conclusion at this time "For the record, messages should be typed, described in XSD, and as loosely coupled as possible -- as specified in their XSD definitions." if the implementations are as loose, we have a problem that makes it even more difficult to resist the .Net system and it is the same problem that made IE ubiquitous through no fault of MS. Consider that this will affect the majority of the tools and tool vendors. Jonathan is quite right but I'd say this problem will be even more immediate for the tool vendors than the users and developers. The Internet has a rough way of shaking out the 'almost but not quite there' technologies and products. len
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format