• To: "'Jonathan Robie'" <jonathan.robie@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@A...>
• Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 15:16:14 -0800

> From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:jonathan.robie@s...]

<snip/>

> Er, do they really call it a "reference implementation"?

Er, no. But Dare's message "nominating" Microsoft's implementations as good
examples of conforming processors somehow got transcribed in my mind into an
offer nominating their implementations as reference implementations.

Sorry. My mistake.

It would still be terribly nice to see some release notes, though,
explaining what's different between 4.0 SP1 and RTM. We've been burned by
"bug fix" patches before. I'd like to know why we should upgrade.

• Prev by Date: RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Next by Date: RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Previous by thread: RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Next by thread: RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread