[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"

• To: 'Rick Jelliffe' <ricko@a...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 08:04:41 -0600

Now that is uncommon.  I'm amazed the firewall 
didn't grab it and kick it back.  Or it is like 
The Simpsons, censor-proof by guile.

I am without my glasses today.  Reading that reference 
was slow sledding.

Ummm.... 26 + 1.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Jelliffe [mailto:ricko@a...]

From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

> But any tweaking of the alphabet has serious implications 
> to that framework.  How long (John Cowan>?) has our 
> standard western alphabet had 26 regular characters? 

You mean 27 don't you? [1]

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

[1] http://www.evertype.com/standards/wynnyogh/thorn.html

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: XSLT and the 80/20 point (was RE: Tim Bray on " Which Technologies Matter?")
• Next by Date: RE: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• Previous by thread: Re: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• Next by thread: RE: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread