• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,"Mike Champion" <mc@x...>
• Subject: RE: RE: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn'tdese rve its "X".)
• From: "John Evdemon" <jevdemon@v...>
• Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 13:05:22 -0800
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcHEiTzqXdhYurQkSBKK+B4+p/YxWAAABX/w
• Thread-topic: RE: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn'tdese rve its "X".)

On Tuesday, March 05, 2002 5:03 PM, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> 
> Also, saying "show me this information as well-formed XML" is a pretty
> good way to assess how deeply complicated all the hidden bits are.
>  
Isn't the phrase well-formed XML a bit redundant?

JohnE

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RE: RE: Stupid Question (was RE: XMLdoesn'tdese rve its "X".)
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • RE: RE: Stupid Question (was RE: XMLdoesn'tdese rve its "X".)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RE: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn'tdese rve its "X".)
• Next by Date: RE: RE: Stupid Question (was RE: XMLdoesn'tdese rve its "X".)
• Previous by thread: RE: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn't dese rve its "X".)
• Next by thread: RE: RE: Stupid Question (was RE: XMLdoesn'tdese rve its "X".)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread