• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>
• Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 16:50:47 -0000
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEE993@HQ5>

 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> Paranoids build better systems than Bible salesmen. ;-)

It took a minute, but funny!

Bill de hÓra

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4

iQA/AwUBPIT3ZOaWiFwg2CH4EQKB+QCcCNDgowvgs9b0MZ00DmGlyIFzwSQAoKOW
AbQZGNvWt50g6JGCEqf/hkB9
=oZqB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• References:
  • RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• Next by Date: Re: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• Previous by thread: RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• Next by thread: RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread