Re: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
Simon St.Laurent wrote: >>XML is now legacy. Its users community is screaming against any change >>and its specification body seems paralysed by its structure and the >>diverging interests of its members... > > I'm not sure that makes XML as a whole legacy. Anything that is actually implemented and deployed is by definition legacy. Googling for "legacy Java" (exact phrase) today produced some 350 hits, and even "legacy XML" almost 150. As usual, Frederick Brooks called it correctly almost thirty years ago in _The Mythical Man-Month_, chapter 1: [T]he product over which one has labored so long appears to be obsolete upon (or before) completion. Already colleagues and competitors are in hot pursuit of new and better ideas. Already the displacement of one's thought-child is not only conceived, but scheduled. [...] As soon as one freezes a design, it becomes obsolete in terms of its concepts. Of course, he also says, with understatement that is less than usual in our profession: The new and better product is generally not *available* when one completes his own: it is only talked about [...]. The real tiger is never a match for the paper one, unless actual use is wanted. Then the virtues of reality have a satisfaction all their own. -- John Cowan <jcowan@r...> http://www.reutershealth.com I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format