• To: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: XML should NOT be a new programming language
• From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@d...>
• Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 14:32:43 -0600
• References: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E05573B7F@r...>

>>If you think that's interesting then you should take a look at the XML
serialization technologies in .NET which among other things allow one to
convert class definitions to W3C XML schemas and back. Thus object
instances can be represented as valid XML documents and converted back
and forth as well.<<

That's what the Pascal classes I mentioned do. They have been able to create
an XML Schema from run-time type info (in C++ or Delphi) since mid 2000--
back in the CR days...

Jeff Rafter
Defined Systems
http://www.defined.net
XML Development and Developer Web Hosting

• References:
  • RE: XML should NOT be a new programming language
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML should NOT be a new programming language
• Next by Date: Re: canonicalization
• Previous by thread: RE: XML should NOT be a new programming language
• Next by thread: RE: XML should NOT be a new programming language
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread