• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: "Which Technologies Matter?" & xml processing model s...
• From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 18:52:38 +0100
• References: <200203191542.g2JFg1Z10990@l...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020314

Uche Ogbuji wrote:

> Measuring the success of programming languages is very hard, 

To close the loop and come back to Tim:

http://maps.map.net/cat/Computers/Programming/Languages

Looks like Java is doing a good job, at least in the universe of Dmoz 
editors...

Thanks Antartica for this picture!

Eric
-- 
See you in Paris.
                      http://www.afnet.fr/afnet/net200x/programme.html#T9
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org      http://4xt.org           http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------

• References:
  • Re: "Which Technologies Matter?" & xml processing model s...
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Next by Date: RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Previous by thread: RE: "Which Technologies Matter?" & xml processing model
• Next by thread: RE: Re: XSLT and the 80/20 point (was RE: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?")
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread