• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 17:27:05 +1100
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEE9F9@HQ5>

From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

> But any tweaking of the alphabet has serious implications 
> to that framework.  How long (John Cowan>?) has our 
> standard western alphabet had 26 regular characters? 

You mean 27 don't you? [1]

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

[1] http://www.evertype.com/standards/wynnyogh/thorn.html

• References:
  • RE: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• Next by Date: RE: Re: XSLT and the 80/20 point (was RE: Tim Bray on " Which Technologies Matter?")
• Previous by thread: Re: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• Next by thread: RE: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread